Post to this Key West real estate blog by Joe D Wells
Freddie’s QC Goals; Jumbo Investor Chatter; Lender Updates; Where is Fannie & Freddie’s Business Coming From?
“The check’s in the mail!” Hah! The
Fed reports the
number of checks paid
has declined from close to $50B in the 1990s to about $20B. With tax
rates being what they are, and many chafing at increased government
intervention in most areas of our lives, perhaps we’re heading toward a
barter economy.
I have heard of broadcasts, and podcasts, but…tipcasts? That’s a new one for me – but
Freddie has one from Chris Mock, Freddie’s VP of QC, deals with Freddie’s quality control goals, and is worth two minutes of your time.
Yesterday the commentary mentioned the
layoffs at Flagstar –
it turns out that the number is 600 of our brethren who will be on the
streets. “Flag” said it will create annualized cost savings of $40
million for the company. “In 2013 we made important progress in
resolving certain legacy issues, and we are now focused on further
strengthening our financial and operational foundation,” said Alessandro
DiNello, Flagstar’s President and Chief Executive Officer. “We are
committed to being a highly efficient and best-in-class operator in each
of our businesses, and this restructuring will align our infrastructure
with today’s business environment, including the significantly reduced
mortgage origination market.” But why is any lender different than
Flagstar and looking at production versus overhead? We can expect to see
continued cutbacks, and selective hiring.
“Rob, what do year from
jumbo investors out there? We continue
to be beat up on our pricing by the big bank’s retail channel.” I don’t
see that changing much – they have huge amounts of deposits that need
to be put to work. And we all know that those jumbo loans are often
great credit risks – and there are no pesky gfees to worry about. The
recent about-face on gfee changes is wreaking havoc with some of these
new private equity investment funds. They are there to purchase jumbo
production, and are probably not happy with the recent Mel Watts
statement pushing gfee increased down the road. They are basically
trying to figure out what they should be buying and were counting on
continued gfee hikes – they cannot compete with the likes of Wells Fargo
and other banks though seems they are looking to setup a few big
accounts to purchase production from—i.e. large regional banks.
For example, let us look at 5/5 jumbo ARM loans – it is indicative of
other products. It is a good product, but with limited investor
interest. Everyone wants to get setup with Pentagon Federal’s
correspondent program as they have a 5/5 ARM – but word on the street is
that PenFed is not bringing on new clients. So are there 5/5 jumbo
correspondent buyers, either delegated or non-delegated? Mark Paoletti
with
Mortgage Elements writes, “In the past the 5/5 used to be a
popular product of
Community Banks, S&L’s and Credit Unions. It was a good product to
help the depository do Asset/Liability matching against 5 year CD’s. But
that was when many depositors had a habit of rolling a 5 year CD into a
new 5 year CD when it came due and the institution could count on new 5
year CD’s on a regular basis. Institutions also matched 5 year CD’s to 5
year auto loans and assigned limited funds to mortgage
product restricting their availability. They may do them for their own
retail but won’t offer them on a wholesale or correspondent basis. When
their belly was full they pulled the product. That’s why those 5/5 ARMs
always had a history of appearing then disappearing.”
What is also very telling is the percent of Freddie and Fannie volume coming from their
“Top 5″ lenders.
If you compare 2008 versus 2013, and include all lenders’ channels, the
percentage of F&F’s total volume from the top five sellers has been
declining since 2012. In the 4
th quarter of 2013, the top
five lenders comprised only 39% of Fannie’s total volume, compared to
61% in 2008. Freddie derived 43% from the top five versus 60% in 2008.
As “Inside Mortgage Trends” points out, this is due to a number of
factors, including some top lenders downsizing or bailing entirely, an
increase in smaller lenders and smaller lenders selling directly to
F&F (versus selling to the aggregators, who then in turn sell to the
agencies), and the rise of large non-bank servicers like Nationstar,
Walter, or Ocwen. And speaking of servicing – the same thing is
happening there: it has become more spread out over a diverse group of
companies.
This is by no means an endorsement of the program, or Chase Bank, but
I found this interesting. Four years ago Chase launched its
Mortgage Cash Back program;
a program which allows customers with a new or refinanced mortgage –
and a personal checking account – to earn up to $500 annually. Recently
Chase announced that more than 368,000 customers received $87 million
since the company launched the program, and that they will distribute $4
million in December ’13 alone to customers with loan anniversaries
occurring in the month. In 2013, Chase will pay out $37 million in
program incentives. For those not familiar with the program, mortgage
payments are automatically deducted from a Chase personal checking
account and on the anniversary of their loan each year, customers can
cash out or pay down the principal on their mortgages to save even more.
By choosing the pay down option, customers receive an additional
savings in interest, which could lead to paying off their mortgage
early.
Let’s continue on with company-specific news to see some other trends
out there. As always, it is best to read the complete bulletin for full
details!
SunTrust retired its high price exception for FHA transactions as of January 10
th and is now requiring only one appraisal for Key Loans up to $1.5 million.
Per the Dodd-Frank rule on Points and Fees,
First Community Mortgage
is imposing a maximum compensation percentage of 2.75% for brokered
transactions, and any loans locked within FCM limits which later fail to
comply with the 3% threshold may be required to transition to
borrower-paid or may have the lender administration fee lowered. A new
“No Lender Administration Fee” option will be available for all programs
apart from Jumbo that will allow lenders to price the loan with the
lender admin fee as a .625 LLPA that will be incorporated into the net
price shown on the pricing engine for all lender-paid compensation
scenarios. This does not apply to VA loans, which will not be subject
to an FCM Lender Administration Fee or any additional pricing adjustment
for the no fee option. The minimum compensation requirements have also
been removed.
First Community Mortgage has announced that it will be expanding its
lending territory into Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota, where it
will offer all of its loan types subject to the specific product’s
geographical restrictions.
The
Agencies have issued a reminder that they will be
implementing the second phase of the UAD compliance warning edits, which
will be changed to fatal UAD edits in the UCDP on January 26
th.
This affects the Quality of Construction Rating, Location Rating, View
Rating, and Condition Rating data fields. Any appraisal submitted to
the UCDP that receives one or more fatal UAD edits will result in the
issuance of Hard Stop 401 and the receipt of a “Not Successful” status,
which makes it ineligible for delivery to either GSE.
Beginning February 17
th, the Agencies will be requiring
sellers to implement several new data elements into the ULDD, including
the disclosed rate index (index rate used to draw closing docs for ARMs)
and number of mortgaged properties (total number of mortgages
properties for all borrowers on the loan, including the subject
property).
Effective for all loans with applications dated January 14
th and after, FNMA has revised its
condo and PUD policies to
allow no more than six month of regular common expensive assessments to
have priority over the FNMA mortgage lien, even in cases where the law
provides for a longer priority period. Although the FNMA selling guide
does not currently provide for this, the condo or PUD project legal
documents must show compliance with this requirement. This revision
does not affect projects located in jurisdictions that enacted a law on
or before January 14
th that allows regular common expense
assessments to have priority for more than six months, provided that the
law references FNMA’s requirements (i.e. the Uniform Condominium Act or
the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act).
Wells Fargo has updated its Residual Income Evaluation to
exclude FHA transactions, even when they are classified under rebuttable
presumption. FHA loans with RESPA application and case number
assignment dates of January 10
th or after are required to
comply with QM, including Points and Fees, as are all such transactions
where the RESPA application is dated before January 10
th.
For transactions with case numbers assigned before this date, the loan
should be underwritten to comply with HUD guidelines and will be
reviewed by Wells under the temporary provisions by the CFPB.
Effective for RESPA applications dated on or after January 10
th,
HPML transactions will be ineligible for Wells Prior Approval; however,
they may still be qualified using delegated underwriting authority.
In response to recent market activity, Wells is revising its
Non-Agency ARM
purchase pricing adjustor from 62.5bps to 37.5bps, effective for all
Best Efforts transactions locked, re-locked, or re-negotiated on or
after January 21
st. For all Non-Conforming locks, re-locks,
and re-negotiations, the FICO adjustor for LTVs between 70.01 and 80%
has been revised to -.125.
Chase has updated its Non-Agency
debt analysis guidelines to
exclude Federal, State, and local taxes; FICA or other retirement
contributions; commuting costs; union dues; open revolving accounts with
zero balances (with the exception of HELOCs); automatic deductions to
savings accounts; child care; and voluntary deductions from being
included in the DTI ratio. The derogatory credit guidelines as they
pertain to DU and LP have been revised to encompass both FNMA and FHLMC
guidance on seasoning requirements.
Chase’s FHA guidance has been updated to prohibit the use of real
estate tax credits as qualifying assets to offset the minimum 3.5% down
payment requirement, and while a seller real estate tax credit can be
applied towards the cash to close on the HUD-1, the down payment must be
verified regardless of cash brought to or received at closing.
Turning to the markets: up a little, down a little. Yesterday rates
were down a little, the 10-yr closed at 2.84%, and agency MBS prices
were better by about .250 – mostly based on supply versus demand: the
Fed is buying $2.86 billion a day and mortgage banker supply is only
producing about $1.1 billion. (Also boosting Treasury performance
Thursday was the latest monthly capital flows release from the Treasury
department which highlighted that China and Japan boosted their holdings
of Treasury bonds by $12 and $12.2 billion in November, respectively,
to a record high.) There is certainly nothing for “inflation folks” to
talk about – there is very little movement in the CPI or PPI. We will
have a little news today, consisting of the December Housing Starts and
Building Permits duo (they came out pretty close to expectations, but
Housing Starts were down almost 10%, and Permits were down 3%), the
December Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization couplet, and the
normally forgettable preliminary January Consumer Sentiment number.
From the housing numbers this morning, MBS prices have improved slightly
and the 10-yr is down to 2.83%.
THESE ARE ACTUAL COMPLAINTS RECEIVED BY THOMAS COOK VACATIONS FROM DISSATISFIED CUSTOMERS (part 2 of 2):
11. “The roads were uneven and bumpy, so we could not read the local
guide book during the bus ride to the resort. Because of this, we were
unaware of many things that would have made our holiday more fun.”
12. “It took us nine hours to fly home from Jamaica to England. It took
the Americans only three hours to get home. This seems unfair.”
13. “I compared the size of our one-bedroom suite to our friends’ three-bedroom and ours was significantly smaller.”
14. “The brochure stated: ‘No hairdressers at the resort’. We’re trainee
hairdressers and we think they knew and made us wait longer for
service.”
15. “There were too many Spanish people there. The receptionist spoke
Spanish, the food was Spanish. No one told us that there would be so
many foreigners.”
16. “We had to line up outside to catch the boat and there was no air-conditioning.”
17. “It is your duty as a tour operator to advise us of noisy or unruly guests before we travel.”
18. “I was bitten by a mosquito. The brochure did not mention mosquitoes.”
19. “My fiancé’ and I requested twin-beds when we booked, but instead we
were placed in a room with a king bed. We now hold you responsible and
want to be re-reimbursed for the fact that I became pregnant. This would
not have happened if you had put us in the room that we booked.”